Page 277

I am still a born again Christian, after my very serious, expected Death. I always have been one, since I was 18.5 years old. I had a serious car accident in 2017, which almost killed me.
I was in hospital asleep, for a full 4 months or so, and still find it very hard to remember - many things, which happened before my accident. However, the major thing is, that God has revealed Himself to me very specially. He has awoken me to remember my trust in Him.
It is amazing, that the only things I really remember, is that I used to run this blog - and I do remember much about it, and will continue it. Many things have left my memory, but I do remember my salvation and how to serve Jesus/God. I also remember Him, and His needs for me to serve Him, and win others to Him.
God has now enabled me again, to be able to write very strong messages.
I now write messages that I want you to read. They are clear messages from Him, that should be very easy to read, and lead you all more towards God. Please now read all my 350 blog messages, or so. These blog messages have been written in here, up to Feb 2021.
You will see that they are real and true messages from God, and therefore cannot and should not be ignored. These should open our eyes to what God wants us all to learn in these days.
I hope you can use my blog and read it properly. I desire that what God has spoken to me seriously, during and after this accident etc will be revealed to many people.
I especially want you to know the truth of His free eternal salvation. This cannot be ever lost by those who trust Him, as He Himself gives us all the power to trust in Him. It is His power He gives us, that we can never lose. This is because, this power is retained by Him - not us.
View Archive →
2 replies on “277 Amazing Miracles told, of how mighty Russia, is losing War, against UKRAINE. Also, why no Rain in Britain, since May 2 0 2 2”
Hey Keith,
You had asked me to send you an email. I was letting you know that I just did that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please read this message, that you asked me for, and I responded to.
This message will show, how the lying Catholics, try to find reasons – why they can follow/believe in the terrible Apocrypha.
This includes, how they are always looking for reasons, to deny the full truth – of the 66 Books of the Bible. It shows, why they prefer to choose Godless ways to read a False Bible, including using the Apocrypha.
This message will reveal, why the Apocrypha cannot be trusted, the problems it gives, and why it is definitely not true. It can never be trusted as good.
It will reveal the dangers, if you ever follow it. I will then discuss, how your life will be improved, if you do not follow it.
I now present the various evidences, of the evil, that is now happening amongst us – by the Lying and Pretence Catholic church. They do not present the Christian whole/real Truth, but reveal harm, that they are causing – through the False Catholic Organisations.
A Case Against the Roman Catholic Apocrypha
• Introduction:
The real Church needs to know, the True real Bible, that they should use – and what parts are False, that they should not use.
A major source of division, between Roman Catholics and Protestants, is the Protestant Correct way – of numbering, the TRUE accepted 6 6 Bible Books, that should officially be included in the Bible.
While the Protestant Canon of Scripture, is comprised of sixty-six Books, the Roman Catholic Old Testament, contains SEVEN additional books.
The extra SEVEN disputed books, that the Church of Rome embraces, are: Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, and Baruch.
These extra 7, should never be followed, like the Catholics do – because they are very false. This can be proved, to be so.
Also, translators of the Catholic Bibles, have incorporated a few extra verses – into the proto-canonical texts, of Daniel and Esther. Roman Catholics, confidently Parade this Volume, as being Canonical Scripture (but incorrectly).
Why do they do this, and not reject the Apocrypha? The Apocrypha can be shown, as much weaker in truth, than the Bible. It is not a product, of divine inspiration.
• Rejection of the Apocrypha, by The Jews:
It is very interesting, that the Apocryphal Books, were never included in the Hebrew canon of Scripture!
Jesus Christ spoke of the Law and Prophets, within these Books. That is: Matthew 7: 1 2, 2 2: 4 0, Luke 1 6: 1 6. He also agreed on the threefold division, of the Jewish Canon. See Luke 2 4: 4 4.
By the way, I am very much a very strong believer in Jesus. I can see terrible folly, within the Catholic Church, and am not Jewish. But I can see much to support, later salvation, for the Jewish People.
The Deutero-Canonicals, were written during a time, when no prophets were alive. That was during the Old Testament time, of 1 Maccabees 4: 4 1 – 4 6, 9: 2 7.
The Jews were the ones, most acquainted, with the Books of the Old Testament (at that time) – since they were the ones, who wrote them.
The Jewish historian Josephus, rejected the Apocrypha, as not inspired. Yet the Catholics do not reject it. That should show, how Catholics must be even worse, than the Godless Jews of that time, and even NOW!
• The So Called, Divine Inspiration, of The Roman Catholic Apocrypha. It was denied by Many, in The Early Church:
Sometimes people would accept an Apocryphal Book, while rejecting the inspiration of another. Pope Gregory the Great, speaking of the Maccabees, said: “We are not acting irregularly from the Books. Though they are canonical, they are brought out, for the edification of the Church. We bring forth testimony of this”.
This certainly did not, edify the Church.
Through Commentary on Job 1 9: 3 4, Athanasius wrote, “There are other Books, besides the aforementioned, which are not Canonical. Yet they have been designated, by the Catholic Fathers, to be read – by those who join us, and who wish to be instructed in them.
The Catholics, now support these very Bad Books, as follows:
The Word of Piety
The Wisdom of Solomon
The Wisdom of Sirach
Esther and Judith
Tobias ”
If you read these books, it should be obvious, how Bad they are, and cannot ever be accepted, as the Word of God.
Thirty-ninth festal letter, 3 6 7, I believe – contains this:
“ Theologians, of the Eastern Church, such as these: Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Amphilochius. These drew up formal lists, of the Old Testament, in which the Apocrypha does not appear.”
Bruce M. Metzge. He gives an Introduction to the Apocrypha, p. 1 7 9.
Patristic writers, did indeed cite from extra-biblical writings. But quotation of a source in itself, does not imply acceptance into the canon, or belief in divine inspiration. It was not until the Council of Trent, in 1 5 4 6, that the Apocrypha – was officially deemed, to be a part, of the Roman Catholic Canon.
All True Christians, should be aware of all this, to help them reach out better – in their saving message, to Catholics.
The online New Advent, of the Catholic Encyclopedia, says: “In the Latin Church, throughout the Middle Ages, we find evidence of hesitation – about the character of the Deutero-Canonicals. There is currently, one good thought about them, but another thought – not favourable, to their authority and sacredness. Wavering between the two, are a number of writers, tempered by some perplexity – as to their exact standing, and how they are amongst Thomas Aquinas”.
Few are found, to seriously acknowledge their canonicity, whose appeal for these books – is within “Canon of the Old Testament”. Note, “from the Greek Septuagint translation, of the Old Testament, an Old Latin Version was made – which of course, also contained the Apocryphal Books, among the Canonical Books”.
“It is not strange therefore, that Greek and Latin Church Fathers, of the second and third centuries – quote the Apocrypha, with the same formulas of citation. This they use, as they refer to the Books of the Old Testament. This includes: Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Clement of Alexandria. They all do this.
Hardly any of these Catholics, knew any Hebrew. There were small numbers of Catholic Fathers, who either had a small bit of personal knowledge of Hebrew (example: Origen and Jerome), or had made an effort to learn – what the limits of the Jewish Canon were. Example: Melito of Sardis. These were usually careful, not to attribute canonicity, to the Apocryphal Books. They recognized, that these contained edifying material, suitable for Christians to read.”
Catholics, continued to have Bad thoughts, and follow: Non-Christian ways.
Bruce M. Metzger. An Introduction to the Apocrypha, p 1 7 8.
“The following, covers a passage (cannot be shown here, though) which is self-contradictory and inconsistent. It states that these dead “Had gone to rest in godliness” (v. 4 5), but then it tells us, that these dead warriors were idolaters, killed by God – due to their idolatry.”
This reveals, how much you can never trust Catholic Teachers, who never know enough – to be able to tell us, the real truth.
I have been informed, massively, of terrible things – done by Catholics, and of following the FALSE Maccabee teachings. I will not share this now, as the emphasis of all this, has already been revealed on this page. That is, about why we cannot follow Catholic Ways, or their Belief – in greater numbers of Bibles.
The Greek translation of Daniel, like that of Esther, contain several pieces – which are not found in the original text. The most important of these additions, are contained in the Apocrypha, though. False stuff like this, keeps appearing there. Also note the following 4 books
3 Maccabees
4 Maccabees
Psalm 1 5 1
Psalms of Solomon.
These 4 mentioned above, are rightfully not found in any Roman Catholic translation of the Bible.
But we need to be aware, that the mere Fact, that the Apocrypha may have STILL been included in Septuagint translations – should never allow this collection of 4 books, to be treated like Apocrypha. These, and the Apocrypha, should NEVER ever – be accepted by Catholics, as they are never accepted by God.
Many True/Loving Protestant scholars, have noted, that while the Septuagint was first translated several centuries – before the time of Christ, it apparently was not until after Christ, that the Apocrypha was brought into the Catholic Translation. We know of no Septuagint manuscripts, earlier than the fourth century, that contain the Apocrypha.
This suggests, that the Apocrypha, was not in the original Septuagint. But even if a first-century manuscript were found, with the Apocrypha in the Septuagint, that still does not mean – that the Apocrypha belongs in the Canon!
• The Roman Catholic Church, Did Not Declare the Apocrypha, As Being Canonical – Until the Council Of Trent In 1 5 4 6. It Did So, With the Intention Of Establishing Scriptural Support, For Its Unbiblical Traditions:
St. Jerome saw the difference, between Canonical books and Ecclesiastical books. The latter he judged, were circulated by the Church, as good spiritual reading – but were not recognized, as authoritative Scripture. The situation remained unclear, in the ensuing centuries. For example, look at these views of: John of Damascus, Gregory the Great, Walafrid, Nicolas of Lyra, Tostado. These continued to doubt the Canonicity, of the Deutero-Canonical Books.
According to Catholic Doctrine, the proximate criterion, of the biblical canon – is the infallible decision of the Church. This decision was not given, until rather late in the history of the Church, at the Council of Trent. The Council of Trent, definitively settled the matter, of the Old Testament Canon. That this had not been done previously, is apparent, from the uncertainty that persisted – up to the time of Trent.
Why do Catholics, keep forever believing, that they have the final decision – on Bible eternal things of God? Why do they not realise, that IT IS GOD/JESUS, who has the FINAL WORD – regarding how everyone, should read/understand the Bible?
LikeLiked by 1 person